Thursday, 25 March 2010

Comment by Roger Bootle: Budget 2010

"Government needs first and foremost to look to its own failings. Incompetent and bloated government is one of the most serious factors holding the British economy back."

Australian Worries


First asset deflation, then price inflation. How to defend wealth amid the "melt up"...?

SO HOW ABOUT that...? asks Dan Denning in his Daily Reckoning Australia.

For two days running after land-mark healthcare legislation passed the US Congress, stocks in New York made a new 17-month high. The market likes it when uncertainty is lifted from the horizon. It's now clearly all down-hill from here.

We jest. Back in Baltimore earlier this month, at dinner, it was argued by one and all that stocks might be a good bet to beat inflation. Or, put another way, if you're going to beat inflation, you're more likely to beat it in stocks than cash.

This is not a value-based argument. But it IS an argument for why nominal gains in stock markets are not inconsistent with rampant or even hyper inflation. We're not saying that's what's going on right now. And of course, in our one-two Big Crash dance card, asset deflation precedes the Melt Up.

But it's hard to call the rally since last March's lows anything else but a melt-up. Stocks aren't cheap now. And they are pricing in a lot of future earnings growth. In a world where the private sector and businesses are deleveraging and where credit growth – excepting the public sector – is shrinking, the fuel that generates earnings and income growth is running out.

Not that sovereign bonds are any safer. Another point that came up at our dinner earlier this month is that certain high-quality corporate bonds would be better bets than certain faltering sovereign bonds. Or as Bloomberg reports, "The bond market is saying that it's safer to lend to Warren Buffett than to Barack Obama."

If you judge executives by their ability to deliver regular and outstanding returns on equity and capital, the above point is self evident. Buffett has a long track record of delivering high returns on net tangible assets. This partly explains why the yield on two-year notes sold by Berkshire is 3.5 basis points lower than the yield on a two-year US Treasury note.

Buffett generates cash from his assets and borrows sparingly for sensible acquisitions of good businesses which he has meticulously valued (most of the time). The Federal Government is not a corporation. But its chief asset is probably its tax slaves, whom it is currently in the process of flogging for more money to pay for more new programs which the country can't afford.

The trouble is, as Moody's points out, when you flog your tax slaves in order to simply pay interest on money you've already borrowed, you move "substantially closer" to losing your AAA credit rating. Moody's predicts that, "the US will spend more on debt service as a percentage of revenue this year than any other top-rated country except the U.K. America will use about 7 percent of taxes for debt payments in 2010 and almost 11 percent in 2013."

Does this mean short-term capital flows – as Greece plays out in slow motion – will favour Dollar-denominated assets that are:
  1. not long-term government bonds; or
  2. are stocks...?
We'll see. But when US investors get nervous and flee home to the US Dollar, what happens then? And when US and UK banks get into capital self-preservation mode, doesn't that leave Australia in the vulnerable position of being a capital importer in a world where the cost of capital is going up?

For now, the whole thing makes us nervous. And if the bulls are happy to rush in where nervous angels fear to tread, more power to them. And let's not forget the elephant in the room: property.

How best to Buy Gold today? Make it simple, secure and cost-effective by usingBullionVault...
Dan Denning24 Mar '10
Formerly editor of Strategic Investment with Lord William Rees-Mogg, Dan Denning is an independent investment analyst now based in Melbourne, from where he edits the Australian edition of The Daily Reckoning. He is also author of the best-selling The Bull Hunter (Wiley & Sons).

Saturday, 4 April 2009

Petro Dollar Risk

The coming financial storm no one is talking about

BY MANRAAJ SINGH

Dear Reader,

There’s a major trend that could have a devastating impact on the US dollar.

What’s shocking is that I haven’t come across a single other financial analyst who has fully grasped the implications of it.

This is crazy, given that it will affect anyone who owns dollar-denominated investments, whether it’s gold, international shares or commodities. In fact, even if you aren’t directly invested in them, there is very good chance your pension fund is.

That’s how big this is.

The thing is, though, you can turn this trend to your advantage, as we’ll see in a moment.

I’m talking about the planned creation of a single common currency in the Gulf States. A new monetary union just like the eurozone, but for oil rich countries.

That might not sound like a big deal. After all, who really cares what a bunch of Arab countries are doing with their currencies?

But this is going to have a colossal impact on the world economy. Let me explain…

Last Friday, I explained why the dollar’s long-term value is under threat as the US economy falters. But now let me show you the threat to the dollar that the rest of the world still hasn’t picked-up on…

The great petrodollar merry-go-round is about to break down

You see, right now the dollar receives a huge amount of support from being the standard currency for international trade. The international oil trade is a big part of that. Oil is priced in dollars on the international market. It is bought and sold in dollars.
What that basically means is that countries that want to buy oil need to have dollars. Countries that sell it are left holding dollars. That fuels global demand for the American currency. It props up its value…

Right now, the only major producer that sells in a different currency is Iran. They take their payments in euros and Japanese yen. But it is the Gulf Arab states like Saudi, Kuwait and the UAE that are at the heart of the global oil trade.

But now think of a situation where global oil production is increasingly concentrated in the hands of the Gulf Arab countries. And, as I explained in a recent special report, that is what is going to happen as non-OPEC production collapses.

Now consider what the impact on the dollar is going to be when those countries say they don’t want to be paid in dollars anymore. Once they’ve got a common currency you can bet they are going to price their oil in it. They will want to be paid in Dirhams or Dinars or whatever else it is that they eventually name it.

That is going to short circuit global demand for the dollar. Because oil importing countries won’t need to buy dollars to pay for their oil anymore. The Gulf countries won’t be left holding huge reserves of dollars which they then have to recycle into the US…

Right now the oil-exporting countries are the second-biggest holders of US government debt after China. That’s because they get paid for their oil in US dollars. A lot of that money then gets reinvested in US dollar-denominated assets. But if they aren’t being paid in dollars anymore, they won’t have to recycle them by investing in US government bonds. International demand for the dollar is going to plunge. And the value of the dollar is going to plunge with it.

Two years to D-Day?

The Gulf Co-operation Council (GCC) states have been talking about this for a long time. And they signed the first concrete agreements to implement it last September. Since then they have been moving ahead with their plans. By the end of this year, they should have a monetary council in place. This will be a precursor to the Gulf central bank. And it will decide on the name and value of the currency.

They had planned to have their new currency in place by 2010. I doubt they will manage it that quickly though. The way I see it, the impact of the financial crisis will force them to push it back by about a year.

But there is absolutely no doubt about it – the Gulf common currency is now on its way. And when it happens it is going to kick the legs out from under the dollar.

As I said though, there are ways that you could profit from this. An obvious trade is to go short on the dollar. There are listed funds that allow you to do that. And again, not all dollar-denominated assets will lose out. Whilst the value of US shares, for example, is going to be eroded, the value of certain dollar-denominated commodities like oil and gold rises as the dollar weakens.

Kind regards,

Manraaj Singh
For The Right Side

Editor’s recommendation: Manraaj Singh is Chief Investment Strategist at Profit Hunter. As he explains, when the dollar falls, oil goes up. Click here to receive his latest smart way to play the “oil rebound”.

Wednesday, 28 January 2009

Golds Success is Silvers Failing

When will gold break through $1,000 an ounce?

The difference between gold and other precious metal

Thanks to Dominic Frisby, in London

Today, I wanted to look at precious metals in general. Not just gold, but silver, platinum, palladium and even some of the lesser known platinum group metals, such as rhodium and indium.

We are living through one of the greatest financial crises in history – possibly the greatest. The contraction in credit has forced selling in everything.

Many were under the illusion that precious metals would be safe in such a scenario. But they haven’t been. Let’s look at why...

Gold is maintaining its purchasing power, unlike money

The key thing to remember is that this is a financial crisis – a crisis of money. Of all the precious metals, gold is the only purely monetary metal. Yes, it has some industrial use, but a negligible amount. Gold’s use in jewellery has derived from its monetary function, which is to store wealth.

Money has two functions: one is to be a medium of exchange, the other to store wealth. Gold has long since been useless as the former (although technically sovereigns are still legal tender) but as the latter it has acted soundly. Yes, it fell against the yen last year, but so did everything. Yes, it was volatile against the dollar, but in the grand scheme of things, gold is maintaining its purchasing power, while money, be it the yen, the dollar or the euro is falling.



Some currencies have been weaker than the dollar. One ounce of gold now costs 110,000 Icelandic Krona for example, up from around 40,000 in 2007. To be honest, I’m surprised it isn’t higher. (Thanks to Nick Laird at www.sharelynx.com for the charts.)



Britain has similar, though currently less extreme, problems to Iceland. This has been reflected in the price of the pound against gold.



So gold, although volatile, has performed well.

Silver is more vulnerable than gold

Silver, too, is a monetary metal. As many of you will know, the words ‘silver’ and ‘money’ are interchangeable in some ninety or more languages: ‘argent’ in French, for example; ‘plata’ in Spanish. ‘Pound sterling’ once meant a pound of sterling silver. But, historically, silver’s role as money was less as a store of wealth and more as a day-to-day medium of exchange. That role has now expired.

Many silver bugs will point to silver’s numerous and ever-increasing industrial uses. But the demand for these uses has decreased as the crisis has unfolded. The outlook for business is grim, and the market has reflected this in the price of silver. In other words, silver’s industrial use, the very thing that made it desirable, suddenly made it undesirable.



In short, silver outperforms gold during an inflationary boom, but underperforms during a deflationary bust. This is reflected in the gold-silver ratio, which spiked dramatically in the Autumn.



Many were calling for that ratio to fall below 20. It will one day. The historical ratio is 15 – there is 15 times as much silver in the earth’s crust as gold. But we are a long way from that. We may see 100 first.



But those who bought silver with pounds will not be as disappointed as dollar buyers. It’s not too far off recent highs:



The story isn't great for platinum or palladium either

I’m afraid it is the same story for platinum and palladium as with silver. Only a year or so ago, many - myself included – looked at South Africa’s political problems and its energy crisis and asked where in the world platinum was going to come from. Indeed we are still asking ourselves that.

But the market doesn’t care. Though precious, platinum is still an industrial metal. The car industry is, for now, doomed and the market has no time for platinum, despite its rarity.



It was the same story for palladium, which fell from $600 to about $175 per ounce, and for rhodium it was even worse. The rhodium chart was amazing. It seemed to do nothing else but go up. For years this was the case – then crash.



Yes, silver and platinum group metals have a use in jewellery, but jewellery sales are down, despite its use as a store of wealth. Even gold jewellery sales are down. All the demand for gold is safe-haven investment demand.

By November of course, the industrial precious metals had become way too cheap. The market recognized this and platinum and silver have since rallied. And I suspect they will continue to rally along with all commodities for the next month or three.

But the greater demand is for money, so over the longer term – the next three years or so - we can expect the demand for the monetary metal gold to be greater than the demand for the industrial.

When will gold break through $1,000 an ounce?

However, those short-term traders who play gold in dollars should perhaps exercise some caution here. It has had a good run since November and could easily bounce back off the trendline below. In fact, the ideal technical scenario is to gently pull back and then cruise through at the next attempt.



Those who read a lot of my stuff will know my theory – and it is no more than that – that gold makes 6 to 9 month up-moves, followed by periods of consolidation lasting about 18 months. I suspect we are in one such period. I do not see a break out to new highs above $1,000 in the very near future, but we'll be there by this time next year.

So I am holding onto every ounce of gold and every quality share that I own. Gold’s uber move could strike at any time and I don’t want to miss it when it comes. Like the stock market crash of last autumn, it has been years in the making, it will be swift in the unfolding and you have to be positioned.

If you’re not in it, you will not win it.

Turning to the wider markets...



The FTSE 100 fell another 0.4% yesterday, closing at 4,194. Mining stocks and utilities were among the bigger fallers: Xstrata lost 4.9%, Anglo American 1.3% and Antofagasta 0.8%. Severn Trent Water was down 3.5%, and Scottish & Southern Energy lost 0.7%.

In Europe, the Paris CAC 40 lost just one point to end at 2,954; the German Xetra Dax, meanwhile, was down three points at 4,323.

In the US, financial stocks led the Dow Jones Industrial Average up 0.7% to 8,174. Bank of America climbed 8.3%, while Citigroup added 6.6%. The broader S&P 500 index closed up 1.1% at 845, and the Nasdaq Composite finished 1% higher at 1,504.

Overnight in Japan, the Nikkei 225 rose 0.6% to 8,106, sustained by hopes of a US 'bad bank' rescue plan. The broader Topix index, however, fell 0.1% to 804.

Brent spot was trading at $43.63 early today, and in New York, crude oil was at $42.39. Spot gold was trading at $898 an ounce, silver was at $12.13, and platinum was at $948.

In the forex markets this morning, sterling was trading against the US dollar at 1.4283 and against the euro at 1.0743. The dollar was trading at 0.7526 against the euro and 89.08 against the Japanese yen.

And there was mixed news for Britain's economy today. In a rare ray of sunshine, satellite TV operator BskyB announced it will create 1,000 jobs in its customer service and equipment installation teams, as it expects strong demand for its high definition services. Sales were up 5.8% in the six months to December 2008. But there was bad news for the commercial property market, as a report issued by Moody's concluded prices in the UK could fall by as much as 25% this year.


Wednesday, 30 July 2008

Banks Under Threat

Barclays dismisses San Marino lawsuit

Barclays Capital will fight vigorously a lawsuit filed against it in London’s High Court by a banking client Cassa di Risparmio di San Marino, which alleges misrepresentation by the UK investment bank in the sale of complex debt products.

The San Marino-based bank is seeking damages of at least €170m (£134m) in losses and lost income related to five complex credit-linked notes bought by CRSM for €450m in 2004 and 2005.

It is also seeking unspecified damages related to the restructuring of three other complex notes in June 2005.

“The legal action has no merit and we will contest it vigorously,” Barclays said on Tuesday.

The suit is part of an increasing number of actions faced by banks over their complex credit products since the market turmoil that began last year led to widespread losses in the financial industry.

Lawyers said that many disgruntled clients are pursuing the banks that had arranged complex debt products, but that claims are mostly settled well before they near a court filing, which is seen very much as a last resort, particularly in Europe.

Barclays has faced a number of similar lawsuits over collateralised debt obligations it has structured and sold.

In 2005 it settled a $151m claim brought by HSH Nordbank of Germany.

HSH is also currently suing UBS, the Swiss bank, over alleged mismanagement of a $500m portfolio of collateralised debt obligations to London. The case, which is set to be heard in New York, was among the first to be filed over subprime mortgage losses in the wake of the credit crunch.

Barclays, meanwhile, is also named in a lawsuit filed this month by Oddo Asset Management of France in New York, which relates to two investment funds known as “SIV-lites”.

That suit also seeks damages from Solent, a London-based hedge fund that managed one of the investment funds, and from McGraw-Hill, the owner of Standard & Poor’s, the rating agency.

Bankers said Italy was beginning to discover the depths of its problems with structured products. Marco Elser, senior manager in Rome at Advicorp, an independent investment banking group, said: “Half of Italian banks don’t know what they have in their accounts, because the derivatives around which the structured products were sold are so complex that it would take an Einstein to figure it out.”

Additional reporting by Guy Dinmore in Rome
By Paul J Davies

Published: July 29 2008 19:05 | Last updated: July 29 2008 19:06
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2008

The action above could be the first in an avalanche of law suits filed by investors who could feel a little hoodwinked by the avaricious banks and their rush to sell "products" to their clients in the headlong desire to make ever increasing profits from a "business" that should only be marginal at best.

When you run a business that has its hands in your pockets, the tendency is for it to help itself.

John Burke

Wednesday, 11 June 2008

Technorati Link

Technorati Profile

Its all about cross networking and interconnections!

Or is it just to get Technorati up the google rankings by inward links? So to balance things here are a list of my blog and web interests with lots of great partners and projects: No particular order.

G8way
Jamie Lawrence Football Academy
JLFA Blog
Refill Food
Cherrie Box Media
Emerging Markets Investor Services Ltd
Watersons Marketing Group
Inspirational Seminars Ltd
Inspirational Seminars Blog
Sylvia Modu
Faye Klein Lingerie
DMR Ltd
Bevin Fagan (who sadly died in April 2008)
Gold Investments
Property Investment and Credit Crunch
Business Start Ups
Yorkshire Network
Gold Bullion Trading
Click4Marketing
Affordable Seminars
Barbur Realty
Canal Craft
Management Resource
Unique Sounds

Plus a whole load of ongoing projects in Africa to build Solar Tower Power Stations, renewable energy systems and exploding the myth of global warming and the great carbon tax con.

I am also very keen on lean government along the lines that Hong Kong adopted and not the over-bloated British Model!





Tuesday, 27 February 2007

Silver Bullion Coins

First Gold Bullion Coins

South Africa produced the first modern one ounce gold bullion coin, the Krugerrand, in 1967. Since then, other countries have produced their own gold bullion coins.

Followed by Silver Bullion Coins

In 1986, the United States of America started issuing a one ounce silver version of their one ounce gold eagle bullion coin. In 1988, Canada introduced a one ounce silver bullion coin, the silver Maple Leaf, with a design already familiar from the gold Maple Leaf bullion coin introduced in 1979.

One Ounce of Pure SilverThe original idea was to provide silver coins which would contain a guaranteed one ounce of fine, or pure, silver. The Canadian Maple Leaf is produced from silver which is refined to a purity of 99.99%.

World Versions

There are now many countries which issue silver bullion coins, many are countries where silver is mined, and these mainly issue silver bullion coins every year, and there are other countries which make the occasional silver bullion issue.This has added to the diversity of different designs available to the collector, and also means that the various mints have begun to compete by offering more choice of design.

The Australian Kookaburra series, for example, feature a different design each year, but always based on the kookaburra, a distinctive native bird.

Great Britain started to produce their silver Britannia bullion coin in 1997 following the ten year success with the gold Britannia. Strangely enough, the 1997 version is only available in a proof finish, which rather contradicts its status as a bullion coin, but it is very attractive, and is available in a standard uncirculated bullion version in subsequent years. Britannias are produced appropriately enough in Britannia Silver which is 958 parts per thousand pure silver, but contains a full ounce of silver, with the addition of a small amount of copper.

Other silver bullion coins include American Eagles, Chinese Pandas, Somali Monkeys, Mexican 1 Onza Plata Pura.

Choice of Sizes

In 1992 the Perth Mint in Australia introduced two ounce, ten ounce and one kilo silver bullion coins, so that there is now a choice of sizes available. Canada introduced a 10 ounce silver Maple in 1998.